Nursery World - Second-class EYP

I am sorry that Kay Heslop found my comments about the Early Years Professional proposals insulting (Letters, 1 June). Kay is exactly the kind of well-qualified, committed graduate who would make an excellent early years teacher. I find it appalling that she has not been supported to gain qualified teacher status. I still maintain that we need to find ways of enabling practitioners like Kay to become specialist early years teachers, rather than introducing another level of practitioner.

I still maintain that we need to find ways of enabling practitioners like Kay to become specialist early years teachers, rather than introducing another level of practitioner.

While the first EYPs may be very well-qualified, in the longer term people without a graduate academic background will almost certainly be allowed to qualify (the standards indicate this quite clearly). This is why I am concerned.

If we accept a lower standard for senior staff in early years settings then we will inevitably be separated off from the school sector and seen as second-class citizens.

How much better it would have been for Beverley Hughes to allocate some of the 52m to supporting well-qualified practitioners to become teachers. But, of course, Early Years Professionals will not have the same status as teachers and will not be subject to their pay scales or conditions of service. That's what makes them attractive to this Government.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included