Opinion

Opinion: The time for well-being

Last week, Ofsted finally published its draft well-being indicators for schools. Framed by global financial panic and the sudden removal of KS3 tests, this previously incendiary notion was met with little more than a splattering of commentary.

Indeed, far from eliciting controversy, these measures were generally welcomed. Of course, schools well understand that children's well-being is critically bound up with their capacity and ability to learn. The educational orthodoxy set in train through Every Child Matters and the Children Act and cemented by the specific duty on schools to promote pupil well-being has considerable traction.

But successfully promoting and then measuring well-being is complex. What schools want to see is where and how they can make changes that improve outcomes within their sphere of influence. Well-used, the indicators should help them do that. For some, though, how inspectors weigh these well-being indicators against hard attainment data during inspection remains a real concern.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here



Nursery World Jobs

Early Years Educator

Munich (Landkreis), Bayern (DE)

Toddler Floor Leader

Wallingford, Oxfordshire

Deputy Manager

W12 0TN, London (Greater)