Opinion

Editor's view - Here we go again

Editor’s View
Just as the Department for Education had finished swatting down all the criticism of its 30-hour policy arising from the National Day Nurseries Association and Family and Childcare Trust reports, yet more pops up – this time from inside government with the National Audit Office report. It’s a bit like the old arcade game Whack-a-Mole!

The NAO highlights the way that funding rates for the free entitlement have fallen in real terms, and also the doubts of many that new levels will be sufficient, leading to possible shortages either for disadvantaged two-year-olds or for the three- and four-year-olds.

It also says that the effectiveness of the £2.7 billion invested in free entitlement funding is still not being tracked properly.

This is particularly pertinent with the EYFS Profile due to be scrapped next year, to the concern of health and education professionals who do not want to lose what is beginning to be very useful data. Meanwhile, the future of the Baseline seemingly hangs in the balance amid rumours circulating that it is to be ditched after millions of pounds of investment.

We could be set for much more of this in the next few months, as the proposed funding levels and the rationale for them come under increasing scrutiny.

Being the best

If you want to forget about 30 hours for a while, why not read about the brilliant practice at our Nursery of the Year, Little Barn Owls, then start your own entry for the 2016 Awards (www.nurseryworldawards.com)? Or find out about a fantastic one-day conference we are running on the hot topic of self-regulation, with world-renowned expert Professor Clancy Blair from the US (www.self-regulation.co.uk).



Related