
The report, Entitlement to free early education and childcare, highlights the extent to which many providers are concerned about the level of funding for the 30 hours, putting the success of the 30 hours’ policy at risk.
If the funding is not right, it says, early years settings may choose to cut back on offering places for disadvantaged two-year-olds, whose care costs them more, to enable them to offer extra hours for threes and fours.
While providers are keen to offer the 30 hours some providers may choose not to offer the scheme at all, it says.
This would jeopardise the Department for Education’s aims to improve educational outcomes for children who would benefit most from free childcare, the NAO warns.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Unlimited access to news and opinion
-
Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news
Already have an account? Sign in here