News

Inclusivity of SEN

I think Annabel Tall (Letters, 1 July) is not looking far enough. She believes the needs of children with medical/physical special needs such as Down's syndrome or cerebral palsy are being 'lumped in with a motley collection of children who are simply out of control, undisciplined or badly behaved'. That's quite an assumption. The reality is that many children, through no fault of their own, suffer from emotional, developmental or behavioural difficulties. I believe such children also have special needs and fail to see how, by helping and supporting them, it could possibly be detrimental to other children.

That's quite an assumption. The reality is that many children, through no fault of their own, suffer from emotional, developmental or behavioural difficulties. I believe such children also have special needs and fail to see how, by helping and supporting them, it could possibly be detrimental to other children.

I thought the idea of inclusion is for all children, regardless of their disability, to be supported and fully included in mainstream education wherever possible.

Are we now heading towards exclusivity when deciding who is and isn't entitled to inclusion? I hope not.

* Di Tulloch, via e-mail

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here