Features

Best practice: Behaviour charts – good or bad?

Emma Davis considers the need to rethink how early years settings manage children’s behaviour and the language that is commonly used around it
Behaviour charts are still commonly used, but the evidence is that they are ineffective
Behaviour charts are still commonly used, but the evidence is that they are ineffective

There is often much talk about the need to ‘manage behaviour’ in the early years. Educators have a host of strategies that can be employed to promote positive behaviour, one of them being the use of charts in the setting or classroom, which come in many different forms. You might have seen traffic-light behaviour charts, happy and sad clouds, rockets, rainbows, or emojis.

The premise behind them, no matter what the design, remains the same – reward and punishment. If children do something deemed worthy by an adult, they are moved up the chart. However, inappropriate behaviour means a child is moved down or to the ‘sad side’. The idea is that the chart is seen as an incentive to encourage ‘good behaviour’, with children conforming to what is considered acceptable.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here