Men in Nursery - 12-03-07 22:39
by: iggyfishtank
Bit long but it needs o be. This issue cannot be discussed in soundbites.
As you missed the point completely I will put it again. We have the right to respect parents wishes but where they are prejudiced you do not have to take them into account at all. I agree race is a separate issue but it was an analogy to show you how crazy your point was. You would not respect the wishes of a parent who didn’t want a black person to work with their child for the only reason being that they diddnt trust black people – because that is just wrong. It seems., from your information given, that your idea of partnership is doing whatever the parents say. That is not partnership. You should always do what’s in the best interests of the child and explain to the parents why you are doing it – namely as your looking out for the best interests of the child and it is our job as the people who work with children to do what is best for the child not for the parent. If they want to go elsewhere that is there choice but we cannot be held over a barrel by parents otherwise they run the nursery and the people with the training and the knowledge don’t. It is also our role to educate parents to make the right decisions and to understand why we make decisions –as they are in the best interests of the child. If you withold food from a child for no reason then I don’t know why you are still in the early years profession to be honest and if you don’t follow your own policy then, quite frankly, I don’t know why you bother writing one in the first place. I mean, what’s the point of writing something that looks all nice but you don’t actually believe in and are willing to ignore if there is a bit of resistance to it. I agree with you that decisions should be made with an element of reasonableness (not sure that’s a word but ill let you off as my grammar and spelling is awful) but it is not reasonable to stop a man doing his job because of no reason other than prejudice or ignorance.
I will show how partnership should be done using your example of a mother who has had a child abused by a man.
JJ = Joshua Jones
P = Parent.
JJ: Hello, welcome to your first day for you and little Child A.
P: Hello, there is one thing I am worried about.
JJ: Oh go on then, we like to work in partnership with parents to allay any fears they have.
P: I see you have a man working for you.
JJ: Ah yes, Mr X. He’s very good with babies, he’s got over 10 years experience and a masters in early Years Education…I don’t know why he works here! Ha Ha
P: ha ha…erm, well..the thing is…you see little Child A was abused my a male and, I don’t want her to be put in danger again.
JJ: Well, there is no chance of that here, he has passed his CRB check (as have all our staff) and all our parents love him. He hasn’t had a bad word said about him in over ten years. Of course we cant do anything to change his job description as that would
1. Go against the Sexual Discriminatin act 1973 ( I think – the date I mean)
2. Punnish him for something he had nothing to do with.
3. Actually admit that he may be a danger simply because he is man, as this would actually do.
4. Show Child A, who had appalling treatment by one person who happened to be man, that all men are something to be afraid of and should not be involved with young children as they somehow pose a danger.
5. Not giver Child A a different role model of men that it so clearly needs having gone through such a terrible thing by a person that happened to be a man.
6. . Make a clear seperation of roles that men and women hold in the workplace and in society which is something we do not want to do.
7. It is also in the best interests of the child due to the points I have made and also we fell children should have other male role models in their life.
8. Also in this country we are innocent until proven guilty so to take any action would be unlawful and he could sue me if he wanted…not that he would ha ha ha.
P: But arnt men more of a danger.
JJ: Well, statistically yes but the vast majority of the abuse by men is carried out in the home on their own children and a man hasn’t gone to jail for abuse in a nursery since the late 1960’s. So I think you are quite safe, even if you look at the numbers in black and white.
P: Well, im still not sure.
JJ: If you were to put your child in a different setting that agreed to your request then it would not be acting in the best interests of the child and that’s what we both want, don’t we?
P: Well, yes….
JJ: Would it reassure you to know that we always have 2 people in our nappy room when changing children – for the safety of all our children and staff members? That been our policy for years.
P: Oh, yes…that’s fine.
JJ: You see, if we feel there is a danger then there is a loophole that anyone could get through. We feel that loophole should be closed for all people.
P: Ah now I see why you do it.
JJ: Indeed, now if you have any other concerns then please let us know...whether its about a member of staff or an element of our practice.
P: OK, will do. Thanks for being so open and honest and telling me why you do things that way, I diddnt know that before but now I have all the information I feel much better.
JJ: Its ok, any time. You can stay with Child A for this morning if you want, just to make sure they settle in ok. Its understandable you may have felt that way but in the long run it would not have been the best result for everyone.
P: (thinking) Oh, that’s better, I was so worried, but now im much happier.
It is not about offending sensibilities. You are trying to change the issue. Its equality and being innocent until proven otherwise…in fact its not even about being under suspicion in the 1st place. It about the, frankly wrong, idea that men are more of a danger to children in early years settings. No matter how anyone tries to dress it up that is the issue. We do not have to blindly follow what parents think, we can advise them that in our professional opinion that it is too early for a child to start potty training (to use another example). We could also advise them that in our professional opinion it would b a waste of their child’s time and could make them more stressed about the potty and actually make it more difficult in the long run. Its about saying, and doing, what is the right thing – not what is the path of least resistance.
In your reply (and anyone else who fancies a go) I need you to tell me why we should treat innocent people who have done nothing wrong differently to other people who have also done nothing wrong.